Damn pigs need a good kicking in the teeth...

"DTJ" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 11:45:25 -0500, "Cory Dunkle" >
> wrote:
>
> >They are there to serve the public and keep the roads and towns safe.
Sometimes they seem to forget
> >that, and who pays their salary.
>
> Ha, ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha
> ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha,
> ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha,
> ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha
> ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha,
> ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha ha, ha,
> ha
>
> You mean you really believe that "protect and serve" crap?
>
> That went out in the 50's.
>
> Now it is all about revenue. Cops don't give a **** about protecting
> you, nor do they understand serving the public, and they certainly
> don't give a rat's ass about who pays their salary. They view their
> job as another entitlement program.

Sad but true... I've heard from several people (perhaps even Jaybird) that
the whole "protect and serve" thing was a marketing gimmick for the police
that started out on California when people were starting to get very unhappy
with the police. Jaybird had repeatedly said that it is not his nor any
other cops job to protect or serve any of us. He says such things in a very
mocking and belittling way.

Cory

jaybird wrote:

> "Nate Nagel" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Cory Dunkle wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I went in to the police station today. Seemed to stir up some commotion
>>>when
>>>I talked to the woman behind the glass. She told me to wait and the
>>>Leutenant would come talk to me shortly. Then a cop walked out adn asked
>>>if
>>>I was being helped, I said yes, I was waiting for the Leutenant who was
>>>going to speak to me. The cop asked waht it was about so I politely told
>>>him
>>>what I saw. He got very defensive and asked how I knew he didn't go out
>>>on a
>>>call and it was cancelled. I explained that the cop waited at the next
>>>red
>>>light, and that no matter which way you slice it running a red light and
>>>doing twice the speed limit in a residential zone is reckless. He didn't
>>>like that and told me no it was not reckless or unsafe, then walked away.
>>
>>HAHAHAHAHA! Jaybird, you got a brother in NJ?
>
>
> See? I told ya I'm not the only one who understands...
>

You and that cop are two people who DON'T understand.

"the law is the law. Obey the law."

Um, that means COPS TOO.

nate

--
replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel

jaybird wrote:

> "Nate Nagel" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Cory Dunkle wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I went in to the police station today. Seemed to stir up some commotion
>>>when
>>>I talked to the woman behind the glass. She told me to wait and the
>>>Leutenant would come talk to me shortly. Then a cop walked out adn asked
>>>if
>>>I was being helped, I said yes, I was waiting for the Leutenant who was
>>>going to speak to me. The cop asked waht it was about so I politely told
>>>him
>>>what I saw. He got very defensive and asked how I knew he didn't go out
>>>on a
>>>call and it was cancelled. I explained that the cop waited at the next
>>>red
>>>light, and that no matter which way you slice it running a red light and
>>>doing twice the speed limit in a residential zone is reckless. He didn't
>>>like that and told me no it was not reckless or unsafe, then walked away.
>>
>>HAHAHAHAHA! Jaybird, you got a brother in NJ?
>
>
> See? I told ya I'm not the only one who understands...
>

You and that cop are two people who DON'T understand.

"the law is the law. Obey the law."

Um, that means COPS TOO.

nate

--
replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel

Scott en Aztlán wrote:
> DTJ wrote:
>
> > You mean you really believe that "protect and serve" crap?
> >
> > That went out in the 50's.
>
> Nowadays it's "Collect and Serve."

Or "Collect and Swerve", perhaps?

Scott en Aztlán wrote:
> DTJ wrote:
>
> > You mean you really believe that "protect and serve" crap?
> >
> > That went out in the 50's.
>
> Nowadays it's "Collect and Serve."

Or "Collect and Swerve", perhaps?

>>You see since they enforce the laws, there is really no one who will tell
them when they are wrong. So they like to 'bend' the rules because they
don't expect anyone to complain.<<

I was pulled over on Staten Island the week before Xmas, and the police officer
told me (and I quote) "I can go through stop signs and red lights all day if I
want to". Those were his exact words - the reason he pulled me over was BECAUSE
I saw him run the stop sign and he saw me flapping my mouth (through my closed
car window). I didn't think of getting his badge number until it was too late.

"Fringeisin" > wrote in message
...
>>>You see since they enforce the laws, there is really no one who will tell
> them when they are wrong. So they like to 'bend' the rules because they
> don't expect anyone to complain.<<
>
> I was pulled over on Staten Island the week before Xmas, and the police
> officer
> told me (and I quote) "I can go through stop signs and red lights all day
> if I
> want to". Those were his exact words - the reason he pulled me over was
> BECAUSE
> I saw him run the stop sign and he saw me flapping my mouth (through my
> closed
> car window). I didn't think of getting his badge number until it was too
> late.
>

Power/authority corrupts. No doubt about it!