If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
road courtesy - a question for the masses of rad
I've seen people here say they would never flinch from their lane to
oncoming traffic when on a freeway - I understand that logic as I've lived most of my life in large cities with entrance ramps ranging from a mere few feet where bad drivers come to a dead stop when confronted with traffic moving 30-50 mph faster than them (those people deserve criticism, IMO). But now I live in a small town and was leaving work today from the outskirts of an even smaller town. So, everyday, I am faced with making a right turn (90 degrees) from a road with a speed limit of 35 to a 4 lane divided highway (2 lanes each way) with a limit of 65. There is a VERY generous acceleration lane (not a ramp as there is no elevation to overcome). It goes on long enough for me in my modest V-6 Chrysler to accelerate to the limit before the solid white line even disappears without pressing it anywhere near the floor. So, this evening, I was calmly accelerating up to speed and just as I hit the passing point (where the solid white line turned to stripes shortly before the acceleration lane turns to shoulder) there was a driver in the far right lane (excluding my acceleration lane) that was just close enough behind me that I could not merge without punching it and driving on the shoulder for a brief moment. There was no one else anywhere near us. I expected him to move to the left lane to allow me to merge into "traffic" (the sole traffic anywhere near us - within a half mile ahead or behind us) being me and him. Had I known he was going to be a dick about it, I would have accelerated harder and merged in front on him. Had I been a real dick (and willing to break the law), I would have crossed over the solid white line as soon as I could have while I was still going less than 40, thus forcing him to either brake or change lanes. So, am I unreasonable to expect a little courtesy in this situation? Or is the other driver unreasonable to not afford me the courtesy of merging without having to brake and go behind him. Bear in mind that by the time I hit the merge point I was going 65-70 mph and he was only going about 65, since I passed him as soon as I was forced to merge behind him - and also bear in mind that there was no traffic anywhere near either of us that would have prevented him from moving over one lane. I even considered the possibility that he wanted to exit to the right about 3/4 of a mile ahead - he didn't, so throw that idea out. Opinions? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
road courtesy - a question for the masses of rad
barking pumpkin wrote: > I've seen people here say they would never flinch from their lane to > oncoming traffic when on a freeway - I understand that logic as I've > lived most of my life in large cities with entrance ramps ranging from a > mere few feet where bad drivers come to a dead stop when confronted with > traffic moving 30-50 mph faster than them (those people deserve > criticism, IMO). > > But now I live in a small town and was leaving work today from the > outskirts of an even smaller town. > > So, everyday, I am faced with making a right turn (90 degrees) from a > road with a speed limit of 35 to a 4 lane divided highway (2 lanes each > way) with a limit of 65. > > There is a VERY generous acceleration lane (not a ramp as there is no > elevation to overcome). It goes on long enough for me in my modest V-6 > Chrysler to accelerate to the limit before the solid white line even > disappears without pressing it anywhere near the floor. > > So, this evening, I was calmly accelerating up to speed and just as I > hit the passing point (where the solid white line turned to stripes > shortly before the acceleration lane turns to shoulder) there was a > driver in the far right lane (excluding my acceleration lane) that was > just close enough behind me that I could not merge without punching it > and driving on the shoulder for a brief moment. > > There was no one else anywhere near us. I expected him to move to the > left lane to allow me to merge into "traffic" (the sole traffic anywhere > near us - within a half mile ahead or behind us) being me and him. > > Had I known he was going to be a dick about it, I would have accelerated > harder and merged in front on him. Had I been a real dick (and willing > to break the law), I would have crossed over the solid white line as > soon as I could have while I was still going less than 40, thus forcing > him to either brake or change lanes. > > So, am I unreasonable to expect a little courtesy in this situation? > > Or is the other driver unreasonable to not afford me the courtesy of > merging without having to brake and go behind him. > > > Bear in mind that by the time I hit the merge point I was going 65-70 > mph and he was only going about 65, since I passed him as soon as I was > forced to merge behind him - and also bear in mind that there was no > traffic anywhere near either of us that would have prevented him from > moving over one lane. > > I even considered the possibility that he wanted to exit to the right > about 3/4 of a mile ahead - he didn't, so throw that idea out. > > Opinions? I say you're at fault all the way. It's your responsibility to adjust your speed so you can merge smoothly. From the way you tell it you had plenty of time and space to either merge in front of him or slow down and merge behind him. Looks like you just didn't plan things correctly. He is not required to move to the left to accomodate a merger. Yes - it would have been nice if he had, but that don't mean ****. Switching lanes is dangerous. I very seldom move left to help people merge though i do slow down or speed up to open a space for them. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
road courtesy - a question for the masses of rad
barking pumpkin wrote: > Opinions? No other traffic around????? Even I say that you were wrong, and I'd put it more bluntly if I were him. He holds his speed, and you adjust. You should have been looking for the spot and adjusting long before the lanes merged. What was he, a moving target?? This isn't nearly the same situation as having a lane run out and no place to fit, in which case the other cars need to play nice. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
road courtesy - a question for the masses of rad
In article >, barking pumpkin wrote:
> So, this evening, I was calmly accelerating up to speed and just as I > hit the passing point (where the solid white line turned to stripes > shortly before the acceleration lane turns to shoulder) there was a > driver in the far right lane (excluding my acceleration lane) that was > just close enough behind me that I could not merge without punching it > and driving on the shoulder for a brief moment. > There was no one else anywhere near us. I expected him to move to the > left lane to allow me to merge into "traffic" (the sole traffic anywhere > near us - within a half mile ahead or behind us) being me and him. He has no obligation to move for you. You on the other hand had an obligation to merge without disturbing him. You could have achieved this two ways given your description. 1) a lighter touch on the 'go' pedal and merged behind him. 2) a heavier touch on the 'go' pedal and merged ahead of him. Instead you decided on 3) attempt to make him move out of your way. > Had I known he was going to be a dick about it, Actually you were being that way to him. If he was a dick he would have accelerated and run you off onto the shoulder and forced you to merge behind him. > I would have accelerated harder and merged in front on him. You should have. > Had I been a real dick (and willing > to break the law), I would have crossed over the solid white line as > soon as I could have while I was still going less than 40, thus forcing > him to either brake or change lanes. Yeah, you could have been a bigger asshole than you were. > So, am I unreasonable to expect a little courtesy in this situation? He showed you courtsey, he maintained course and speed. Your desire to have him move for you was the opposite of courteous. > Or is the other driver unreasonable to not afford me the courtesy of > merging without having to brake and go behind him. In a situation where you could have merged safely and cleanly without causing disruption to others, you chose a course that would disrupt the only other driver in the area, because you wanted him to bow to you and show you courtsey. Now you're upset because he didn't do as you wanted. > Bear in mind that by the time I hit the merge point I was going 65-70 > mph and he was only going about 65, since I passed him as soon as I was > forced to merge behind him - and also bear in mind that there was no > traffic anywhere near either of us that would have prevented him from > moving over one lane. You're earlier description indicated that you punched it on to the shoulder, implying that you merged in front of him... this post is begining to stink like the environment under a bridge. > I even considered the possibility that he wanted to exit to the right > about 3/4 of a mile ahead - he didn't, so throw that idea out. How about you don't screw around with other drivers who are minding their own business demanding they get out of your way, when the only reason they are in your way is because you came charging at them. You had every opertunity to make a smooth merge, you chose to make it difficult. You chose to demand another driver who had no obligation to yield, yield to you. Now you're upset he didn't bow to you. I see your kind often on the road. The road isn't a place to excerise your games of control. Next time aim for the gaps behind or in front of the driver in the right lane instead of his passenger side door. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
road courtesy - a question for the masses of rad
barking pumpkin wrote:
> So, everyday, I am faced with making a right turn (90 degrees) from a > road with a speed limit of 35 to a 4 lane divided highway (2 lanes each > way) with a limit of 65. > > There is a VERY generous acceleration lane (not a ramp as there is no > elevation to overcome). It goes on long enough for me in my modest V-6 > Chrysler to accelerate to the limit before the solid white line even > disappears without pressing it anywhere near the floor. > > So, this evening, I was calmly accelerating up to speed and just as I > hit the passing point (where the solid white line turned to stripes > shortly before the acceleration lane turns to shoulder) there was a > driver in the far right lane (excluding my acceleration lane) that was > just close enough behind me that I could not merge without punching it > and driving on the shoulder for a brief moment. > > There was no one else anywhere near us. I expected him to move to the > left lane to allow me to merge into "traffic" (the sole traffic anywhere > near us - within a half mile ahead or behind us) being me and him. It should have been more than easy enough to adjust your acceleration rate enough so that you could have been several car lengths ahead or behind him by the time you reached the merge point. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
road courtesy - a question for the masses of rad
barking pumpkin wrote: <brevity snip>
> So, everyday, I am faced with making a right turn (90 degrees) from a > road with a speed limit of 35 to a 4 lane divided highway (2 lanes each > way) with a limit of 65. > > There is a VERY generous acceleration lane (not a ramp as there is no > elevation to overcome). It goes on long enough for me in my modest V-6 > Chrysler to accelerate to the limit before the solid white line even > disappears without pressing it anywhere near the floor. > > So, this evening, I was calmly accelerating up to speed and just as I > hit the passing point (where the solid white line turned to stripes > shortly before the acceleration lane turns to shoulder) there was a > driver in the far right lane (excluding my acceleration lane) that was > just close enough behind me that I could not merge without punching it > and driving on the shoulder for a brief moment. > > There was no one else anywhere near us. I expected him to move to the > left lane to allow me to merge into "traffic" (the sole traffic anywhere > near us - within a half mile ahead or behind us) being me and him. > > Had I known he was going to be a dick about it, I would have accelerated > harder and merged in front on him. Had I been a real dick (and willing > to break the law), I would have crossed over the solid white line as > soon as I could have while I was still going less than 40, thus forcing > him to either brake or change lanes. > > So, am I unreasonable to expect a little courtesy in this situation? > > Or is the other driver unreasonable to not afford me the courtesy of > merging without having to brake and go behind him. > > > Bear in mind that by the time I hit the merge point I was going 65-70 > mph and he was only going about 65, since I passed him as soon as I was > forced to merge behind him - and also bear in mind that there was no > traffic anywhere near either of us that would have prevented him from > moving over one lane. > > I even considered the possibility that he wanted to exit to the right > about 3/4 of a mile ahead - he didn't, so throw that idea out. > > Opinions? Your bad. It's your responsibility to merge with the flow of traffic causing as little conflict as practical. An ample accleration lane and only one vehicle within a half-mile in either direction makes that a pretty simple proposition. When two dickheads merge upon one another is when lots of calamity sometimes begins. If I had been the other driver under those conditions I would have moved L at the first sign there was a likely conflict with our vectors... just more safe for me and not much of an "inconvenience". ----- - gpsman |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
road courtesy - a question for the masses of rad
Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote:
> barking pumpkin wrote: > >> >>Opinions? > > > I say you're at fault all the way. It's your responsibility to adjust > your speed so you can merge smoothly. Well, I did adjust my speed and fell in behind him, only to just as quickly pass him. > From the way you tell it you had > plenty of time and space to either merge in front of him The only way I could have merged in front of him would have been to break the law by crossing a solid white line or by flooring it instead of using the full length of the acceleration lane to come up to highway speed. > or slow down > and merge behind him. Which is what I ended up doing. >Looks like you just didn't plan things > correctly. Yeah, I didn't. Next time, I will not count on someone being reasonably courteous and will cut them off. > > He is not required to move to the left I never suggested the law required that - common courtesy - well, perhaps, uncommon courtesy says otherwise. > to accomodate a merger. Yes - > it would have been nice if he had, but that don't mean ****. Switching > lanes is dangerous. Sorry, but I explained that there was no one within at least a half-mile of either of us - I didn't exagerrate. Switching lanes would have been the safer option in this case - he didn't know that I wouldn't have just cut in front of him anyway. Had I been you, I probably would have. >I very seldom move left to help people merge though That's probably because you're already in the left lane trying to slow traffic down. > i do slow down or speed up to open a space for them. > This driver did neither. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
road courtesy - a question for the masses of rad
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
road courtesy - a question for the masses of rad
Brent P wrote:
> In article >, barking pumpkin wrote: > > >>So, this evening, I was calmly accelerating up to speed and just as I >>hit the passing point (where the solid white line turned to stripes >>shortly before the acceleration lane turns to shoulder) there was a >>driver in the far right lane (excluding my acceleration lane) that was >>just close enough behind me that I could not merge without punching it >>and driving on the shoulder for a brief moment. > > > >>There was no one else anywhere near us. I expected him to move to the >>left lane to allow me to merge into "traffic" (the sole traffic anywhere >>near us - within a half mile ahead or behind us) being me and him. > > > He has no obligation to move for you. No legal obligation perhaps. That's not what I was asking, but thanks for your opinion anyway. > You on the other hand had an > obligation to merge without disturbing him. As I did. > You could have achieved this > two ways given your description. > > 1) a lighter touch on the 'go' pedal and merged behind him. > 2) a heavier touch on the 'go' pedal and merged ahead of him. > > Instead you decided on 3) attempt to make him move out of your way. WRONG! I could have easily FORCED him to move out of the way, or barring that hit him. Instead, I braked and fell in behind him and proceeded to pass him. I most certainly did NOT attempt to make him move out of my way. > > >>Had I known he was going to be a dick about it, > > > Actually you were being that way to him. If he was a dick he would have > accelerated and run you off onto the shoulder Errr - no - had he accelerated, he would have been out of my way and I would have proceeded unimpeded. Instead, he gave me no choice but to run onto the shoulder or brake and fall in behind him and immediately pass him. > and forced you to merge > behind him. Which I was essentially forced to do. I could very easily have taken 20-30 feet on the shoulder to continue accelerating and merge in front of him > > >>I would have accelerated harder and merged in front on him. > > > You should have. Yeah - hindsight is 20-20. > > >> Had I been a real dick (and willing >>to break the law), I would have crossed over the solid white line as >>soon as I could have while I was still going less than 40, thus forcing >>him to either brake or change lanes. > > > Yeah, you could have been a bigger asshole than you were. LOL - you think I was an asshole here? How did I inconvenience the other driver? > > >>So, am I unreasonable to expect a little courtesy in this situation? > > > He showed you courtsey, he maintained course and speed. Your desire to > have him move for you was the opposite of courteous. > > >>Or is the other driver unreasonable to not afford me the courtesy of >>merging without having to brake and go behind him. Whatever. > > > In a situation where you could have merged safely and cleanly without > causing disruption to others, How did I cause ANY disruption to anyone but myself? > you chose a course that would disrupt the > only other driver in the area, because you wanted him to bow to you and > show you courtsey. Now you're upset because he didn't do as you wanted. > Yeah, I was ****ed that he didn't move left. However, his course was not affected in the least. > >>Bear in mind that by the time I hit the merge point I was going 65-70 >>mph and he was only going about 65, since I passed him as soon as I was >>forced to merge behind him - and also bear in mind that there was no >>traffic anywhere near either of us that would have prevented him from >>moving over one lane. > > > You're earlier description indicated that you punched it on to the > shoulder, No, an acceleration lane (in this case, as I stated, a very generous one) is not the same as the shoulder. Had this been a typical freeway in a big city, I would have punched it since I would have known space was limited. > implying that you merged in front of him... Re-read my original post - I never merged in front of him. I could have if I had punched it, but I see no reason to do that when there are very few cars on the road in what is essentially a rural area. > this post is > begining to stink like the environment under a bridge. > > >>I even considered the possibility that he wanted to exit to the right >>about 3/4 of a mile ahead - he didn't, so throw that idea out. > > > How about you don't screw around with other drivers who are minding > their own business demanding they get out of your way, How did I "demand" he get out of my way? If I had ignored him, that would have been demanding. Maybe next time I will - nah, I probably won't. > when the only > reason they are in your way is because you came charging at them. As I stated, I was using the full length of the acceleration lane - which prevented my merging any earlier to gradually come up to the speed limit of 65 - that is hardly "charging". > You > had every opertunity to make a smooth merge, No - I did everything I could to make a smooth merge. My only other options were to be slothful, which is not in my nature or to floor it, which is also not in my nature unless I have to. > you chose to make it > difficult. You chose to demand another driver who had no obligation to > yield, yield to you. Now you're upset he didn't bow to you. I see your > kind often on the road. The road isn't a place to excerise your games of > control. At the very least, the other driver was the oblivious one. At the worst, he was the ones playing games of "control". > Next time aim for the gaps behind or in front of the driver in > the right lane instead of his passenger side door. > > |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
road courtesy - a question for the masses of rad
gpsman wrote:
> barking pumpkin wrote: <brevity snip> > > Your bad. > Well, sort of - if you insist, however, I didn't cause the other driver any problems. > It's your responsibility to merge with the flow of traffic causing as > little conflict as practical. Fair enough > An ample accleration lane and only one > vehicle within a half-mile in either direction makes that a pretty > simple proposition. When two dickheads merge upon one another is when > lots of calamity sometimes begins. Which is precisely why I braked even though I was a couple car lengths ahead of the other driver when the solid white line finally allowed me to merge legally. > > If I had been the other driver under those conditions I would have > moved L at the first sign there was a likely conflict with our > vectors... just more safe for me and not much of an "inconvenience". Exactly the kind of reasonableness I was hoping for. No big deal - had this happened in a big city - or even a moderate sized one, it would have born no mention. Just emphasizes my experience that drivers in small towns aren't any worse than they are in cities - there are just more of them in highly populated areas. > ----- > > - gpsman > |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
'Rules of the Road' question | dave | Corvette | 13 | November 5th 05 03:54 PM |
Road Ragers? Sorry? Too funny.... | Laura Bush Rules! | Driving | 0 | September 21st 05 01:24 AM |
Women Busted for DUI For Pushing Car | Dave | Driving | 309 | August 7th 05 06:01 PM |
YOU CAN'T DRIVE TOO SLOW | Laura Bush murdered her boy friend | Driving | 93 | April 21st 05 10:34 AM |
Where to get Official Speed Limit Info | [email protected] | Driving | 40 | January 3rd 05 07:10 AM |