James C. Reeves wrote:
> "Sean Scott" <Its@secret> wrote in message
> ...
>
>>"James C. Reeves" > wrote in message
...
>>
>>>"bigblue" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>>>James C. Reeves wrote:>
>>>>
>>>>>| Potentially, it could be a marvelous car. Our dealer has sold so few
>>>>>| that the people there really do not know how to solve some of the
>>>>>| problems.
>>>>>
>>>>>I've not seen a single Max model out on the road yet (and I live within
>>>>>a mile of a Chevy dealer). I have seen one or two sedans though.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I see them all the time--
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I do have one complaint-- there are no child protect locks on the back
>>>>door...
>>>>
>>>
>>>Really? I thought rear door child safety locks were required by law.
>>>Hmmm.. Interesting!
>>>
>>
>>He is talking about the hatchback fifth door i think.
>>
>
>
> You may be right. Interesting though if true. That means that there is a
> law requiring rear door child-proof locks so a kid can't open the rear
> doors...AND that there is a law that requires a internal latch on rear
> liftgates so a kid *can* open those. One just has to laugh at this nonsense
> at times.
>
>
>
No I WAS talking about the actual rear door-- I spoke to the dealer and
they said there isn't an actual law-- If anyone knows of one, can you
post proof??

Thanks--

Tim