View Single Post
  #3  
Old July 12th 05, 12:59 AM
Nate Nagel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

C.H. wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 18:08:20 -0400, Nate Nagel wrote:
>
>
>>C.H. wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 09:56:36 -0700, N8N wrote:
>>>
>>>Nate, I had quite some respect for you until now. My opinion differs
>>>from yours but is just as well expressed, reasoned and properly
>>>referenced.

>>
>>No, it's not.

>
>
> That's merely your opinion and also no reason to become as unpleasant as
> you have been.
>
>
>>It is well expressed, I'll give you that, but the other two
>>- I don't think so.

>
>
> I do, but regardless, your tone is unwarranted.
>
> If my opinion was really as far off as you claim it is you would not have
> to get nasty at every opportunity. The fact that you do points to either
> lack of proper upbringing or lack of arguments.
>
> Chris


Or perhaps exasperation at seeing you disagree with literally everyone
else, presenting no logical or factual basis for your arguments? The
only explanation I can come up with is that you've invested heavily in
GM stock (and if I were in that position, I might be resorting to
desperate measures myself.)

nate

--
replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel
Ads