View Single Post
  #8  
Old December 15th 04, 08:51 PM
James C. Reeves
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bernard Farquart" > wrote in message
news:fTNvd.5547$mn6.1805@trnddc07...
>
> "James C. Reeves" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> The problem is that when a driver goes against protocol, confusion will
>> occur. With confusion increases the risk of a traffic mishap. People
>> should follow all right-away rules/laws...take it if it is theirs and
>> concede it if it isn't. To do the opposite interjects
>> confusion....people delay since the action is "unexpected", etc. etc.
>> People all of a sudden don't know what actions will occur next.

>
> That is the whole problem with "false consideration" it causes
> someone to stop, where they could be expected to go. To wait
> when they should move, others who are not psychic then have to
> react to their un-expected maneuvers.
>
> Bernard
>


Boy did I have a typo in that one! "Right-away"? Glad everyone knew I
meant "right-of-way". Those brain farts are killers!


Ads