Bernard Farquart wrote:
>
> "James C. Reeves" > wrote:
> >
> > The problem is that when a driver goes against protocol, confusion will
> > occur. With confusion increases the risk of a traffic mishap. People
> > should follow all right-away rules/laws...take it if it is theirs and
> > concede it if it isn't. To do the opposite interjects confusion....people
> > delay since the action is "unexpected", etc. etc. People all of a sudden
> > don't know what actions will occur next.
>
> That is the whole problem with "false consideration" it causes
> someone to stop, where they could be expected to go. To wait
> when they should move, others who are not psychic then have to
> react to their un-expected maneuvers.

I try to ALWAYS be predictible no matter how many wheels I'm using at
the time. Does this give me the right to shout truly foul things at the
false-courtesy jerks? Hisband thinks I should just say thank you and
move along. I think I should NEVER get in front of anybody that stupid
and that yelling at them is perfectly OK as long as I don't actually
strike them.

--
Cheers,
Bev
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~
Rule 18: Always tip your hat before striking a lady.