On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 17:49:57 -0400 "Peter"
> wrote:

>The page on my microfiche is dated 9/70. It also shows 210 & 225mm, but I
>deducted the 5mm 'cut-off' shown on the diagram as that would represent a
>more true dimension.
>
>> Is the 220mm on your image also for Type 3s?
>
>Yes (shown as 225mm)

I couldn't imagine what you meant by the "cut-off" so I went back and
looked at the scan again. I had never noticed that before. Now I agree
that your numbers make more sense than the numbers I was reading off
the print.

It makes sense to blunt the important corners on this gauge, but I
wonder why they only blunted one? Is there any indication of which
side we are supposed to face to the firewall?

Now that you've called this to our attention, I think I would blunt
both corners this way, while preserving the dimensions you quoted.

-
-----------------------------------------------
Jim Adney
Madison, WI 53711 USA
-----------------------------------------------