View Single Post
  #12  
Old June 25th 05, 06:17 AM
larry moe 'n curly
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Steve wrote:

> It ****ES me off to see ignoramuses who don't know a
> snap-ring from a bellville spring continue to verbally
> smear crap on a piece of engineering over 10 years after
> the problems have been resolved to the point that the
> CURRENT product has an industry-leading (or near it)
> reliability rate.


How can it have an industry-leading reliability rate when Consumer
Reports' surveys show the following?

Ave. Chrysler Honda Toyota

1998....B.......D........B....=AD..B
1999....B.......F........D....=AD..B
2000....B.......F........B....=AD..B
2001....B.......B........C....=AD..A
2002....B.......C........C....=AD..A
2003....A.......B........A....=AD..A
2004....A.......A........A....=AD..A

If the problems had been solved ten years ago, how do you explain the
low reliability rates for the 1999-2000 Chrysler automatic
transmissions?

Ads