Steve wrote:
> since the tranny
>> and driveshaft are a mercedes item, they are peobably dealing with mercedes
>> for technical support. Therefore it probably takes time to figure out.
>
>Its not "a Mercedes item." That particular transmission, while based on
>a Mercedes design, is different and is built in Kokomo, Indiana- a
>long-time Chrysler transmission factory.
>
>But I agree- this is probably the first time they've seen this complaint
>and are wanting to get factory involvement to figure it out (if its not
>just a troll as I still suspect somewhat... ;-)
>
>It bothers me a little bit when consumers have a problem, immediately

Steve,your right,its mechanical device.ok? What I'm bitching about is,at 44k
where the f&^*k is the factory quality control?How do you deliver a vehicle
to a dealer to sell in this condition? Your gonna tell me the dealer was
unaware of this problem? Right! A.D.
>call the product a "LEMON," and then insist that getting a replacement
>is somehow better than getting the original fixed. Fixed is fixed- its a
>machine, not a living organism. The fact that its been repaired doesn't
>make it somehow inferior to a brand new vehicle that didn't happen to
>have the problem from the factory.


--
Message posted via http://www.carkb.com