View Single Post
  #7  
Old October 20th 04, 07:12 PM
Jack Carter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I don't know where you got your GC weight figure but it sounds far too high!
I have an '04 GC with the HO V8 and have tested it several times with a
G-Tech Pro performance meter. It breaks seven seconds from 0-60
consistently. The GC seems to have a very high RPM stall torque converter
and, as a result, really flies off the line. I'm getting faster times from
my '04 that the 5.7 liter 98 that I used to have.



"Wicked96SS" > wrote in message
...
>
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Jack Carter wrote:
>
> > From what I've read, anyone who owns an 04 Grand Cherokee with the HO V8
> > (AWD) probably won't take a back seat to an RT AWD in a 0-60 run.
> >
> >
> > "Wicked96SS" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > >
> > > Does anybody know what the performance numbers are for the RT AWD? I

have
> > > found several sources for the RWD version, but I am interested in the

AWD
> > > version, and thought there might (probably) be some parasitic loss

from
> > > the AWD system.
> > >
> > > Either way, if anybody has some 0-60 or 1/4mile times and speeds, it

would
> > > be greatly appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Wicked96SS

>
> Do you have any numbers to back that up? I did a little research, and the
> Magnum as a higher rear end ratio, more power, more torque, and weighs
> less... I woudl assume that even the AWD version would be considerably
> faster than the Grand Cherokee...
>
> Grand Cherokee:
> HP: 265 @ 5100 RPMs
> TQ: 325 @ 3600 RPMs
> WEIGHT: 5150 lbs.
>
> Dodge Magnum:
> HP: 340 @ 5000 RPMs
> TQ: 390 @ 4000 RPMs
> WEIGHT: 4393 lbs.
>
> Just curious!
>
> Thanks!
>
>



Ads