View Single Post
  #33  
Old July 11th 05, 04:15 PM
Matthew Russotto
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article >,
Scott en Aztlán <newsgroup> wrote:

>Even at $3/gallon, the cost of gas is only a miniscule fraction of the
>true cost of owning and operating a personal automobile on public
>roads. Now, if drivers paid all those costs DIRECTLY in the form of
>user fees, instead of having it subsidized by everyone via taxes, THAT
>would be a barrier to unlimited consumption.


According to a USDOT study in 2001, 91.2% of people who go to work do
it by car. And 92.1% of all households have at least one car. If drivers
_aren't_ paying the "true cost" of automobiles, who the hell is?

Not only are drivers paying the "true cost" of automobiles, they're
paying to subsidize that 4.9% of people who go to work by public
transit, too.
--
There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can
result in a fully-depreciated one.
Ads