James C. Reeves wrote:
> "Nate Nagel" > wrote in message
> news:1121126430.16f008977b3eb8d144423625d46bf80f@t eranews...
>
>>C.H. wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 18:08:20 -0400, Nate Nagel wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>C.H. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 09:56:36 -0700, N8N wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Nate, I had quite some respect for you until now. My opinion differs
>>>>
>>>>>from yours but is just as well expressed, reasoned and properly
>>>>
>>>>>referenced.
>>>>
>>>>No, it's not.
>>>
>>>
>>>That's merely your opinion and also no reason to become as unpleasant as
>>>you have been.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>It is well expressed, I'll give you that, but the other two
>>>>- I don't think so.
>>>
>>>
>>>I do, but regardless, your tone is unwarranted. If my opinion was really
>>>as far off as you claim it is you would not have
>>>to get nasty at every opportunity. The fact that you do points to either
>>>lack of proper upbringing or lack of arguments.
>>>
>>>Chris
>>
>>Or perhaps exasperation at seeing you disagree with literally everyone
>>else, presenting no logical or factual basis for your arguments? The only
>>explanation I can come up with is that you've invested heavily in GM stock
>>(and if I were in that position, I might be resorting to desperate
>>measures myself.)
>>
>>nate
>>
>>--
>>replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
>>http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel
>
>
> Yikes, you think Chris still owns GM stock! Man, I sold all of mine 3
> years ago! I'm not convinced yet that they're going to make it...but sure
> hope they do! $300+ billion in debt, ~$20 billion in the bank (cash) and
> bleeding at the rate of $1.1 billion a quarter. They have probably less
> than 2-years to turn it around or they're done.

Well, if they do turn around, now might not be a bad time to buy...

nate


--
replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel