Pat O'Connell wrote:

> Dave wrote:
>
>>>> Not at all. If you really needed the advisory sign, chances are you
>>>> wouldn't have lived long enough to see it.
>>>
>>> Whatever.
>>>
>>> But you can no longer claim that "nobody has responded with a
>>> reason..."
>>
>> Nobody has responded with a valid reason.
>
> When your car is wrapped around a guardrail/light post/pillar/whatever
> after ignoring the advisory speed limit because you can't tell how fast
> you're going, I'm sure you'll be able to think of a reason.
>
I doubt it. If he doesn't believe that speed kills then he
probably doesn't believe in seat belts, either.