C.H. wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 18:01:18 -0400, Nate Nagel wrote:
>
>
>>C.H. wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 19:45:09 +0000, 223rem wrote:
>>>
>>>the more in combination with automatic headlights.
>>>
>>
>>Wrong. Period, end of story. The reasons have been discussed to the
>>point of bleeding fingertips. Just like the indisputable fact that turn
>>signal DRLs are a nasty hack and should never have been allowed.
>
>
> If the reasons have been discussed it won't be a problem for you to name
> them. And no, your desire to drive too fast under low visiblity conditions
> doesn't count.
>
> Chris


Already done, by me and others. Some of them in this thread, so I don't
feel the need to retype them because you're unable to use a newsreader.
Thanks for the baseless insult too, that's really improving my opinion
of you.

nate

--
replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel