"HLS" > wrote in message
.. .
>
> "Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message
> n.umich.edu...
> > On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, HLS wrote:
> >
> > > DRL's are, IMHO, better than nothing at all, even if the tail lights
do
> > > not activate, but if would be better if the systems were fully
> > > automatic.
> >
> > No, it would be better if the systems were designed to optimize the DRL
> > function and encourage proper, rather than improper, driver operation of
> > vehicle lighting systems.
> >
> > DS
>
> And what, in your opinion, would the ideal system consist of?

Maybe you missed this, Daniel... I respect your opinions and knowledge on
lighting. What should the ideal system be, considering the driver as part
of the equation?