Jason wrote:
> In article >, SoCalMike
> > wrote:
>
>
>>Jason wrote:
>>
>>>theory but it seems to make sense. What's your opinion on this subject.
>>
>>generally makes sense, especially after a major platform change like the
>>civic just had.
>
>
> Hello,
> There are exceptions to every rule. For example, my '99 Accord is the
> second generation--not the third. It's an exception to the rule since the
> engine and related transmission was first used in the 1996 Acura CL. This
> means that the engine and transmission in my 99 Accord was used three
> years before it was placed in the 99 Accords. That's why I was not
> concerned about it since I knew any defects found in the engine and
> transmission were repaired before it was placed in my car.
>
so the V6 version of the 96 acura and 99 accord didnt have any auto
tranny probs?