On Mon, 09 May 2005 10:54:23 -0500,
(Brent P) wrote:

>In article >, 223rem wrote:
>> gazzafield wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Sorry to get political, but it's great the return you get when you invade
>>> a country for it's oil innit? No, sorry, not the oil. For the freedom of
>>> the people, obviously. Ahem.
>>>
>>
>> No, it wasnt for oil, and not for the 'freedom' of the Iraqis.
>
>I believe it to be neither. The only reason that makes even a bit of
>sense is an attempt to bring about a regional stability for the oil
>supply in general. not taking the oil, not wmd, not freedom.
>

It was done for profit, and not the profit of the average American
citizen.

>If it was freedom, shrub could start by promoting it in the USA instead
>of hindering it even more.
>