Jim Yanik wrote:

> "bernard farquart" > wrote in
> :
>
> > "Jim Yanik" > wrote in message
> > .. .
> >> (Brent P) wrote in
> >> :
> >>
> >> I'm saying that they have higher priorities(for both time and
> >> money),and little if any spare money to buy such machinery that would
> >> be needed. You'd probably need an environmental impact study and
> >> gov't permits up the ying-yang to deal with the left-over wastes.
> >
> > Glygerene, that's your waste.
>
> glyCerine??
>
> Whatever,it still must be properly disposed.
> The government may have something to say about that.

Glycerine is a very harmless by-product. It's often used to make soap.

> > Not too big a deal, maybe make some soap.
>
> Ah,one MORE task for the farmer to spend his plentiful free time on.
> (sarcasm)

It ain't going to make sense doing this at Farmer Jones level ! Any more than
you'd buy your own crude and fractionate it.

Graham