"L.W. (=DFill) Hughes III" > wrote in message =
...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >=20
> > Another howler! It *damn* sure doesn't equal Pi...
> > Pi is one of the *irrational* numbers... that means,
> > for you folk that haven't had advanced math as
> > Bill and I have, that it *can't* be represented as
> > a ratio of integers. 22/7 is only good out to three
> > digits... if you can rattle off 3.1415927 like a phone
> > number, you don't need that 22/7 thing anyway.
> Point is I have "3.14" memorized, you obviously couldn't =
remember,
> otherwise you wouldn't have written: "3..."=20
Recall the beforeposts:
Bill:
>>Just so you now know, the volume change created by mixing is their
>>new density.=20
Me:
>Bill's new science... volume =3D density!
>That's even better than Pi =3D 3... and
>explains the supposed 'weightiness' of
>his scientific posts. Taken by volume,
>they *are* impressive!
I merely compared it to Pi =3D 3... I never
asserted that you asserted that Pi =3D 3.
How's that for complex?
__
Steve
..
|