Matthew Russotto wrote:
> In article .com>,
> > wrote:
> >
> >Inexperience can be trained out. Age-related lack of judgement can
> >only be solved by time. No amount of experience will eliminate lack
of
> >judgement.
>
> You still have to separate those effects to find valid support for
age
> restrictions.

No, actually, you don't.

If there are age-based reasons (such as lack of proper judgement), then
that supports age-based restrictions. The logic is straight-forward.

What isn't supported by logic is that somehow a separation of factors
is relevant.

HAND,

E.P.