Geoff wrote:
>
> linda wrote:
>
>
>>Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:22:34 GMT
>>From: linda >
>>Newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.chrysler
>>Subject: Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!!
>> ___________ mixqec
>>
>>next you will be calling me a gay man in a woman's body!!!!!
>
>
> An interesting non-sequiter. What, pray tell, gave you this idea?
>
>
>>my self esteem is just fine, thank you... as for your self esteem, i
>>think it is overblown (inflated).....
>>
>
>
> Just calling it like I see it, ma'am. By the way, I wasn't referring to
> your self-esteem (which is also apparently low) but rather your
> self-image, quite a different thing entirely. Perhaps you ought to learn the difference
> between the two before you rather hamfistedly go about making
> accusations of egotism. Might I suggest http://www.dictionary.com?
> Fortunately, no capitalization skills are required to use that site.
>

i stand corrected only on my mistake "esteem vs image"... but i still
say it was cute the way you and many others came to THE DUKE's defense.
;-)

however, i only have my opinion and not website to refer to ...




> Fondly,
> --Geoff
>
>
>>Geoff wrote:
>>
>>>linda wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:03:12 GMT
>>>>From: linda >
>>>>Newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.chrysler
>>>>Subject: Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!!
>>>> ___________ mixqec
>>>>
>>>>Your posting only backs up my statements...
>>>>
>>>>i stand by this: i still think IT is cute that you are still defending
>>>>our national hero (a man who married ONLY latino women)... i have also
>>>>stated that i cannot find any internet cites to back up my claim.. i
>>>>don't think i could ever presume that one statement (to which i have
>>>>repeatedly stated, YOU ARE RIGHT!, i cannot find a site to back up my
>>>>assumption) would ever RE-WRITE the history of someone who is so revered.
>>>>
>>>>as for saying i am not smart, well... apparently i was smart enough to
>>>>invoke some reaction out of a guy who has better things to read....
>>>>
>>>>as for you being a *******, well, i can't respond, i only have your
>>>>postings to back up that claim....and if i can't find sites or proper
>>>>documentation, then i can't prove it.....
>>>>
>>>>as for you and i ever meeting, you would undoubtedly never find me
>>>>appealing, thank God........
>>>>
>>>>Chaos, panic and disorder. My work here is done
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>The only panic I note in this thread is in your retreat amid your
>>>"stand(ing) by" something not essential to your original claim. Perhaps
>>>you're trying to save some last remaining vestige of your dignity.
>>>
>>>As to your apparent certainty that I wouldn't find you appealing: I'm
>>>sorry to see you have such a poor self-image. What a shame. These
>>>things can be addressed by a good psychotherapist, perhaps you ought to
>>>consider seeing one.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>--Geoff
>>