Libby wrote:
>
> Needless to say, I'm a little ticked. But, I'm not too car savvy (I'm
> now seeing the error in having two vehicles with the same engine). Is
> this just a problem I'm going to have to such up? If it's their
> mistake, why do I have to undertake the additional costs?

Why does the fact that the problem is being addressed *now* mean that
you shouldn't pay for it? Suppose the current oil requirements had been
in place when you bought the car. Would you have expected not to pay
for your oil changes then?

--
Mike Smith