Big Bill wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 19:50:34 GMT, linda >
> wrote:
>
>
>>Big Bill wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:43:55 GMT, linda >
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>Geoff, i can here you saying this: "if anyone says The Duke was gay,
>>>>>>I'll beat the snot out of you. Same with Errol Flynn. They were Men's
>>>>>>Men, and yer a Commie Pinko if you think otherwise. "
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>If that's really what you "here", then you have a problem. That's not
>>>>>anywhere near what was written.
>>>>>What was written was a request for some sort of evidence to support
>>>>>your claim.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>and i think i have repeatedly stated, I CANNOT FIND ANY SITE. I cannot
>>>>find any evidence.. hell, how much clearer do i have to be?
>>>
>>>
>>>Then why did you post what you knew would be a post that would
>>>generate requests for some evidence???
>>>
>>
>>Honestly, I did not realize that there were so many duke fans, and again
>>as stated, I admitted, i did not find any site to support a claim that
>>our beloved duke was *OMG* gay.....
>
>
> Are you *really* that naive? Or just that young?
> Sure, you posted that thinking, "No one here knows who The Duke is, so
> I can say whatever I want, and no one will even think twice about it."
> This is Usenet. if you don't understand it, lurk for a while.
> Primary rule: never post without some idea of how to defend what you
> say. Especially when you malign an ICON.
>
i wish i really were that naive... to be that young again! thank you
for thinking both....
Actually, I was NOT the original poster that the DUKE was gay. Re-Read
your original posts....