View Single Post
  #6  
Old June 14th 05, 09:00 AM
Kenshlock du la Fehrêtte
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:48:33 -0500, "Bob" > wrote:

>I find Hurc to be less irritating than you two nit wits. Not a thing to say
>and determined to tell it to as many people as you can cross post it to.
>PLONK both of you............


Killfiles are for pussies, Bob. But you knew that already, didn't you


> Bob
>"Kenshlock de la Fehrêtte" <slapsableschubbyface@forever> wrote in message
.. .
>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 02:47:49 -0400, Sarah Czepiel >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 16:41:58 +1000, Kenshlock de la Fehrêtte
>>><http://img106.echo.cx/img106/5117/kenshlockdelafohrtt2vr.jpg> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 02:10:42 -0400, Sarah Czepiel >
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:42:21 +1000, Kenshlock de la Fehrêtte
>>>>><http://img106.echo.cx/img106/5117/kenshlockdelafohrtt2vr.jpg> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 23:51:26 -0400, Sarah Czepiel >
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 22:05:49 -0400, trainfan1
> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 10:55:42 -0700, Spike >
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If my sources are correct - herc ast is done.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Interesting - he has been quieted by someone...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Do tell us the trick!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Rob
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I have no confirmation but last night I sent two emails, one a
>>>>>>>detailed complaint to his ISP, the second a request to block his
>>>>>>>access to just about every server on the net. Whether my request(s)
>>>>>>>were acted upon or his absence is a coincidence I cannot say because I
>>>>>>>don't know. I've not had so much as an acknowledgement from his ISP
>>>>>>>and my source is not in the habit of responding after the fact. The
>>>>>>>problem just disappears. If the latter has been successful 'herc
>>>>>>>ast' is going to find it very difficult finding access to the net.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Peace and quiet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Poor Sarah, still trying to be a netkkkop are we? Give it up, dear, I
>>>>>>suspect that every NSP's abuse desk has blocked you from mailing them
>>>>>>with your frivolous complaints. You're a troll and an abuser, there's
>>>>>>no reason that any abuse person would do anything but laugh at you.
>>>>>>HTH
>>>>>
>>>>>We'll talk KMan when when you can come back through APN using my
>>>>>name and email addy. To your immense chagrin we both know why you
>>>>>can't do that. Maybe you won't be a complete waste of protoplasm if you
>>>>>advise your fellow pest 'herc ast' not to follow your loopy escapades
>>>>>of
>>>>>losing 4 internet accounts before your reptilian brain figured it
>>>>>out...?
>>>>>Why don't you give it a try, Goofball.
>>>
>>>
>>>>SPANK!
>>>
>>>Yes you were, KMan. When you come back as defined we'll talk,
>>>Goofball.
>>>

>> But Sarah, dear, you are the one who claims to have had me banned for
>> life from APN. While it's a fact that you've never been able to read
>> headers, even someone as simple as yourself could see the fault in
>> your logic
>> Funnily enough I haven't been billed to this very day for my news
>> service through them. Doesn't really fit in with your extravagant
>> claims now, does it. But then Czepiel and Reality never were on
>> nodding terms with each other, were they.

>


Ads