In article >,
C.H. > wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 23:02:52 -0600, Brent P wrote:
>
>> In article >, C.H. wrote:
>>
>>> Nice conspiracy theory. Everyone is against the poor drunk (or if you
>>> want half-drunk) drivers.
>>
>> Then what you are saying is that the people who did the imparement
>> studies back in the 1980s were completely incompetent?
>
>No, just greedy.
>
>> Why should we believe they are more competent now? that these studies
>> are any more valid than the ones done then?
>
>Because the alcohol manufacturers don't have quite as much influence.

ROTFL. Who's coming up with conspiracy theories now, eh?