On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 15:34:51 GMT, "Bill the second" >
wrote:

>
> wrote in message
roups.com...
>>
>> Laura Bush murdered her boy friend wrote:
>>> A three time DUI offender should do a few years in prison and never
>> be
>>> allowed to drive again. Anything less is criminal coddling.
>>>
>>> The witnesses say the collision was the kid's fault but that
>> shouldn't
>>> matter. Any drunk driver involved in a fatal crash should be charged
>>> with murder. Just like if you rob a bank and a guard inadvertently
>>> shoots and kills a customer - then YOU will be charged with murder
>> even
>>> though you didn't even have a gun. Of course up in canada the laws
>> may
>>> be different.
>>
>> Your own words: "Any drunk driver involved in a fatal crash should be
>> charged with murder."
>>
>> When you start promoting the imprisonment of Tubby Kennedy, we'll start
>> to take you seriously. Until then, your words define you to be a
>> hypocrite and a loser.
>>
>> I've *seen* kids make the kind of maneuver I *believe* is discussed in
>> the article. If, and as harsh as it may be, this kid made a similar
>> move, Darwinism has played it's part.
>
>Question is, could the collision have happened even if the driver weren't
>drunk? Kids love to dart out in front of cars, with parents no where in
>sight, so I wouldn't rule it out of the realm of possibility.
>
>Although a 3 year suspension still seems a little light for a 3rd time
>offender, but it's Quebec, so what do you expect.
>

He served 9 months in prison - did you not notice that?