In article >,
The Lindbergh Baby > wrote:
>I saw almost the exact same thing the other day on 101 in SF, only it
>was a reverse action (a BMW cutting from #1 to #3). Also, he cut so
>close in front of the car in #2 there was nearly a collision (in fact,
>the car in #2 stopped so fast I thought for a second there had been).
>His luck didn't hold when he got into lane #3. The car coming up behind
>him couldn't stop (speed differential--#3 lane was clear for many yards
>ahead, probably why BMW-head wanted it) and the beemer was rear ended.
>Airbags went off in the car that rear-ended him.

Did you stop to give your name as a witness to the fact that the BMW
driver caused the crash by making the unsafe lane change? Otherwise,
the driver who rear ended the BMW will likely be found at fault.

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timothy J. Lee
Unsolicited bulk or commercial email is not welcome.
No warranty of any kind is provided with this message.