On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 18:04:03 -0400, Nate Nagel >
wrote:

>Dave Lister wrote:
>Chrysler has for many years built good looking vehicles
>> but never consistently put a good engine in.
>
>HUH?
>
>Chrysler engines have traditionally been far superior to Ford and GM's
>offerings (well, at least the lower priced lines, the old Caddy and Olds
>motors were pretty decent.) It's only in recent years that they've had
>issues. The old V-8s were all built like a brick ****house and the
>slant six was even more reliable.
>
>nate

Well, Nate, that is the same as saying Chrysler has sucked far less
than Ford and GM. Since the 60's or so, Chrysler has sucked compared
to what you can get elsewhere.