"Nate Nagel" > wrote in message
news:1118613850.20d62b3932c1985fb12d10cda8db708c@t eranews...
> Dave Lister wrote:
> Chrysler has for many years built good looking vehicles
>> but never consistently put a good engine in.
>
> HUH?
>
> Chrysler engines have traditionally been far superior to Ford and GM's
> offerings (well, at least the lower priced lines, the old Caddy and Olds
> motors were pretty decent.) It's only in recent years that they've had
> issues. The old V-8s were all built like a brick ****house and the slant
> six was even more reliable.
>
> nate
>
>
> --
> replace "fly" with "com" to reply.
> http://home.comcast.net/~njnagel

I've seen a few slant six engines last 300,000-400,000 miles with few
problems in a 1970's fleet of Dusters. And fleet vehicles aren't exactly
the best treated.