"Matt Whiting" > wrote in message
...
> maxpower wrote:
>
> > "Ted Mittelstaedt" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> >>"Glendon" > wrote in message
> >>news:1_629473_3ffcac4d085bd124711a9b87f8909aed@a utoforumz.com...
> >>
> >>
> >>>Without finding
> >>> > the reason
> >>> > that this
> >>> > catcon failed, a new one will be destroyed in short order.
> >>> >
> >>> > Ted
> >>>
> >>>The car has about 200k miles on it.
> >>
> >>Have o2 sensors ever been replaced?
> >>
> >>
> >>>The flashing dash light gives me
> >>>the codes: 12 - 33 - 72 - 55
> >>>
> >>
> >>Don't know that one, but maybe you can find it he
> >>
> >>http://www.troublecodes.net/
> >>
> >>There is also an article on there titled "Catalyst Efficiency Failures"
> >>might be interesting reading.
> >>
> >>Ted
> >>
> >
> > There is no 72, try again, I would bet its 52 (02 sensor)
> >
> >
>
> Actually, I'm pretty sure that 72 is the code that my 96 Grand Voyager
> flashed when the catcon went bad. The funny thing was, this code isn't
> even in the table of the FSM! However, when the dealer read it with the
> scan tool, it said the issue was catcon efficiency not being in spec.
>
> Matt
Matt you could be right, I was told back in 96 that on the newer
vehicles cycling the key was not an acuate way of retreiving fault codes,
On the older vehicles 1994 earlier there was no such thing as a code 72