SoCalMike wrote:
> jim beam wrote:
>
>> without any form of visible deterioration. i say, do a visual
>> inspection. if it apears to be in bad shape, cracking, fraying, teeth
>> worn or deformed, yes, replace regardless of mileage. but if it's
>> not, and you /know/ for sure mileage is within spec, i'd stick with
>> earl's advice.
>
>
> id be curious to know how many 80s/90s vintage civics *ever* get their
> timing belt replaced. its something 99% of people dont even think about.
> im sure some live their whole lives with one belt, then it gets replaced
> when the water pump starts spewing coolant.

from the junk yard viewpoint, i'd say pretty much never. at the bottom
end of the market, does it make sense to spend $300 on a $500 car?
people just keep running those cars until they break. and you'll not
see many junk yard clunkers with broken belts.