View Single Post
  #1  
Old July 13th 05, 04:51 AM
James C. Reeves
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"C.H." > wrote in message
news
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 14:28:56 -0700, fbloogyudsr wrote:
>
>> "C.H." > wrote
>>> Scientific referencing is a rather easy to understand process. You
>>> reference the exact document and the page, maybe the paragraph if
>>> necessary. Just naming a document that may or may not exist in reality
>>> has nothign to to with referencing. If you have data, referencing it is
>>> so ridicuouslsy simple that you should have no problem with it. If not
>>> ... well, we know why you don't reference anything.

>>
>> AFAIK, you have never given us any scientific reference, only your
>> opinions. You lose.

>
> I have referenced this:
>
> http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd...mentofDRLs.pdf
>
> several times.
>
> Reeves and the others (including you) haven't referenced anything. You
> lose.
>
> Chris


Of course Chris fails to disclose that he used the reference I provided to
find this..that is the reference he says (yet again right here) that I
didn't provide.

Had it not been for my reference, he wouldn't have had his. Oh the irony it
just too much!




Ads