View Single Post
  #1  
Old June 6th 05, 03:59 PM
Ed Stasiak
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Taxing Drivers By The Mile: Part II

BBC News
Sunday, 5 June, 2005
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4610755.stm

'Pay-as-you-go' road charge plan

New charges could be used to tackle road congestion
Drivers could pay up to =A31.34 a mile in "pay-as-you go"
road charges under new government plans.

The transport secretary said the charges, aimed at cutting
congestion, would replace road tax and petrol duty.

Alistair Darling said change was needed if the UK was to
avoid the possibility of "LA-style gridlock" within 20
years.

Every vehicle would have a black box to allow a satellite
system to track their journey, with prices starting from
as little as 2p per mile in rural areas.

Mr Darling has outlined his proposals to the BBC - previewing
a speech he will give to the Social Market Foundation on
Thursday.

"The advantage is that you would free up capacity on the
roads, you would reduce the congestion that we would otherwise
face and you would avoid the gridlock that you see in many
American cities today," he said.

"This is a prize well worth going for. We've got to ask
ourselves: would it work. Could it bring the benefits that
I believe it could bring, because it would make a real change
to the way we drive in this country."

A satellite tracking system would be used to enforce the
toll, with prices varying from 2p per mile for driving on
a quiet road out of the rush hour to =A31.34 for motorways
at peak times.

The Department of Transport says the scheme would be fairer
because those who travel greater distances would pay the most.

"We have got to do everything we can during the course of
this parliament to decide whether or not we go with road
pricing," Mr Darling said.

If public reaction is favourable, a pilot scheme planned
for the Leeds area could be rolled out nationwide within
the next 10 years.

It is more likely to make people think about the cost of
a journey before undertaking it

The Environment Agency's Nick Rijke warned that shifting
money away from fuel duty would take away the incentive for
people to use green vehicles.

And AA Motoring Trust director Bert Morris said there were
a number of issues which needed to be addressed.

"Tourism is car-based in this country. Would we have empty
hotels on summer days on the coast if people couldn't afford
to drive?"

It was also important to ensure that drivers with less money
were not penalised, Mr Morris added.

RAC Foundation spokeswoman Sue Nicholson said the plan
could help counter a projected 45% growth in congestion
problems by 2030.

"Providing this tax was substitutional to fuel tax and road
tax and provided we had some other guarantees then I think,
for a lot of people, this would be a tempting option," she
said.

Environmental group Friends of the Earth broadly welcomed
road charging but warned the transport crisis could only be
tackled if money raised was invested in improving alternatives
to car travel.

Professor Garel Rhys, director of the Centre for Automotive
Industry Research at Cardiff university's business school,
believed road pricing would have to be introduced in the UK.

But he warned: "The key is trying to introduce those tolls
without affecting the flow of traffic, ie. not having to
stop and pay at a booth which caused congestion itself.

"Governments will upset at their peril society's wish to do
what it wants to do and that is to move around."

Ads