Your deductive powers are seriously flawed! You really need help,
grabbing for straws like this.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
http://www.billhughes.com/

jeff wrote:
>
> Here is what you wrote:
> L.W.(ßill) Hughes III wrote:
> >Just so you now know, the volume change created by mixing is their
> > new density.
>
> Let's parse your statement:
> [Just so you now know,] Non-sequitur. Ignore
>
> [created by mixing] Qualifier, we can take that out.
> which leaves the meat or your statement:
>
> volume change is their new density.
>
> If you want to divide it up a little finer, the [change] and [their new]
> are simply descriptors referring th the new state and can be dropped.
>
> this leaves "volume is density"
>
> Perhaps you would like to rephrase it in a more coherent and cohesive
> manner?