Maybe it's because you're making simplistic, broad-brushed attributions
based on half-assed conjecture instead of anything substantial. Or
maybe you're right, those who drive "peopleskars" are just more erudite,
intelligent, and naturally more tolerant of humanity.

Those "people", by the way, didn't include gays. Or blacks, Jews,
gypsys, etc. etc. They were to be gassed, burned or shot. Those
"people" included nazis, their subjects, and their sympathizers, only.

So what's your point again? You smoked too much pot back in the day to
make any sense now?

Kevin DeAngelis wrote:
> The fellow who started this thread also posted it on the rec.autos.vw
> newsgroup, to which I subscribe because my wife drives a New Beetle. He (or
> she) posted it at the same time it was posted on this newsgroup, and there
> have been no replies.
>
> I wonder why? Are Ford owners more politically opinionated than Volkswagen
> drivers? I remember all the hippies who used to (some still do) drive VW
> microbuses. They had some interesting politics, which they could eloquently
> describe when they weren't high. Ah, those were the days....
>
>
> "Daniel J. Stern" > wrote in message
> n.umich.edu...
>
>>On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Wound Up wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>No one deserves to be the target of blind, ideological, prejudicial
>>>>>hate.
>>>>
>>>>...unless they're, y'know, gay and living in the YSM (Yoonaad'd States
>>>>of Mairca).
>>>
>>>Homosexuality does not serve as an acceptable excuse for being the
>>>target of hatred
>>
>>Are ya sure? A lot of voters seem to hold the opposite view.
>
>
>