Brent P wrote:
> In article >, Scott en Aztlán wrote:
> > http://www.azstarnet.com/metro/135749
>
> Note the article had to include:
> "He was wearing a helmet" Of course he is still "seriously hurt".

Why shouldn't they mention it? The writer isn't making a judgement,
they are stating facts of the wreck.

> He may have had his 'head down', however did passing traffic keep him
> from getting around the trailer?

What's the difference? Are you going to blame legally driven autos for
something yet another dimwit did on a bicycle?