View Single Post
  #7  
Old December 6th 04, 05:34 AM
truckinsp
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

truck: "We can't have higher speed limits because they result in more
crashes and less deaths."

me: "If people were driving faster, then why were there less deaths?"

truck: "People weren't driving faster."

me: "If people weren't driving faster, then why were there more crashes?"

>truck: <changes subject>


>See what I mean? He doesn't want to admit that he effectively shot his
>own argument in the foot by saying that average American drivers are
>able to choose safe speeds independent of whether a posted limit exists
>or not.


>Besides, if everyone agreed with each other here, then were would the
>discussion be


My story has always been the same....speed kills.....the lack of a speed
limit in MT is proof of NOTHING and should not be used to support increased
speed limits.....MT drivers have always been more responsible than drivers
in more populated states and when given the chance to speed they didn't do
it......now tell me that THAT would happen in California or Ohio or anywhere
else


Ads