You'll never win an argument with Bill. Not here. If you do, he will find
a way to make it a Pyrrhic* victory.

Earle

*<http://www.bartleby.com/59/4/pyrrhicvicto.html>

"Matt Macchiarolo" > wrote in message
...
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") Hughes III" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Hi Dave,
> > It just now showed up at Network Solutions, which is my criteria
> > for telling between Real and just some service pointing to a fake name:
>
> It showed up before in a Network Solutions whois lookup; I posted the
search
> results, identical to what Dave posted. Time to accept the fact the
Network
> Solutions isn't the only domain registration provider anymore. The World
Is
> Flat, Bill. Must've been something on your end to explain why you couldn't
> look it up. I find it very interesting that when Dave posted the search
> results, verifying your mistake, all of a sudden "it just shows up."
>
> >
http://www.networksolutions.com/en_U...sionid=LVNZI5Q
31GEDKCWMEAQCFFA?whoistoken=0&_requestid=446440
>
> "We are unable to process your request at this time. Please try again
later.
> "
>
> > But look at the servers, is your old school network what you'd use, even
> > if it was free like when you went to their school?
>
> It's operated by the University of Pennsylvania, why would they not use
the
> UPenn server?
>
> How look at a Real
> > Domain:
> >
http://www.networksolutions.com/en_U...sionid=LVNZI5Q
31GEDKCWMEAQCFFA?whoistoken=3&_requestid=446919
> > See the DNS servers, dates of operation?
>
> "We are unable to process your request at this time. Please try again
later.
> "
>
> Straw-grasping again, I see. "When you don't like the message, attack the
> messenger."
>
>