On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 23:53:41 GMT, Joe > wrote:

>RichA > wrote in news:29b9d1hdh4nqskq7chvfretks9r0ahj5f5
:
>
>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 00:39:28 GMT, Joe >
>wrote:
>>
wrote in news:1121190942.830467.219550
:
>>>
>>>> This not an official photo. But what do you think? Would
>something
>>>> like this cause you to trade in your Mustang for a Dodge?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.blueovalforums.com/index.php?showtopic=19307
>>>>
>>>> Patrick
>>>> '93 Cobra
>>>> '03 Focus ZX3
>>>
>>>Well, I didn't trade in the Mustang for the Dodge (and I never
>would),
>>>but that thing is neat.
>>>
>>>Joe
>>>Calypso Green '93 5.0 LX AOD hatch with a few goodies
>>>Black '03 Dakota 5.9 R/T CC
>>
>> I have to give it to Chrysler in one category, handling.
>> They have succeeded in bringing back the TERRIBLE handling
>> of the 1970s muscle car, the skidpad and slalom figures for
>> the new Charger are awful. Skidpad Mustang GT, 0.87.
>> Charger? 0.71.
>> -Rich
>
>So why are you comparing the Charger to the Mustang?

Because it's all Chrysler's got that even remotely can be compared to
the Mustang. Lets face it; Chrysler and G.M. would love a car with
the staying power (in terms of sales) of the Mustang.
-Rich