One or the other (on the suspension pieces) or all three?!?!??

Naw, I get it. I've seen the connectors in a Mustang catalog, wasn't
sure how visible they'd be from the outside of the car. We want it to
remain looking as stock as possible.

Thanks for the info!

On 28 Jan 2005 18:44:24 -0800, wrote:

>Bob Landry wrote:
>> New to this place (in fact just found it, once I figured out the
>> search option in my reader). We have an '89 5.0 GT convertible with
>> about 78k miles. Handling is getting a little loose and I'm thinking
>> it's probably time to replace the shocks. The car was set up with the
>> Sport handling package from Ford originally, but are there better
>> shocks on the market now for this car?
>
>Bob,
>
>Note: The "sport handling package" is the same under all 5-liter
>Mustangs.
>
>I would suggest you don't go cheap. I've found it's better to spring
>for quality shocks like Konis or Bilsteins than it is to buy a lesser
>brand.
>
>> Also, any ideas on how to reduce the body 'twist' on this car?
>
>In this order: subframe connectors, strut-tower brace, and a g-load
>brace. They'll make a huge difference!
>
>Patrick
>'93 cobra
>'83 LTD