On 17 Jan 2005 00:47:52 GMT, Jim Yanik .> wrote:

>Dave Head > wrote in
:
>
>> On 15 Jan 2005 03:33:18 GMT, Jim Yanik .> wrote:
>>
>>>Dave Head > wrote in
:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 23:13:58 -0500, Nate Nagel >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Dave Head wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> and those of the others as I move back into the right lane, or stay
>>>>>> left, and let 200 other cars (that probably shouldn't be going that
>>>>>> fast anyway),which I
>>>>>
>>>>>that ain't your call to make, unless you're a cop.
>>>>
>>>> Just glossed right over the numbers that have an extra 1800 lane
>>>> changes being performed on a 2000 mile trip for no good reason other
>>>> than to satisfy an archaic notion and/or religious treatment of the
>>>> subject.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Archaic only in your mind.
>>
>> Still sidestepped the numbers
>>
>>
>
>"your" "numbers".(fictional,I suspect)

What? That a car that is doing the 90th percentile speed and staying left will
only have to change lanes 200 times when encountering 2000 cars, as opposed to
having to change lanes 1800 times if he stayed right and passed left? I think
it's rather obviously in the definition of "90th percentile".

>Still just your rationalization for not following law

Oh, yet another law to break? Big whoop - anyone that simply _catches_ me is
breaking the law by speeding. Add yet another law that gets broken, by all
parties involved? So what...

>and safe driving
>practices.

Its plenty safe. I've been doing it for about 1.5 million miles and haven't
got my name into an accident report yet...

>Even the Euros believe in KRETP.

"Even?"