"Michael Johnson, PE" > wrote in
:

> Joe wrote:
>><snipped a whole bunch of boring BS - except to Joe and I>

LOL!

>> I see what you mean. Talk about going off the deep end... But
>> it's always a pleasure.
>>
>> So what do you think about this CIA leak stuff? This morning I
>> read that it now involves Cheney's aide or something.
>
> I haven't followed it too closely. It looks to me like a big game
> of gotcha by both sides. Also, I think the press is stretching it
> out because there's nothing better to report. I don't think Rove
> broke the law and I've read where her cover was blown way before he
> talked to anyone in the press. It apparently was common knowledge
> that shew worked for the CIA. Plus her husband campaigned for Kerry
> and thought he might get a Cabinet or high level government position
> if he won so, IMO, his motives are suspect.
>
> Rove has driven a stake into the Democrat's heart in the 2000, 2002
> and 2004 elections and they want nothing more than to see head head
> on a platter or at least drag him through the mud a little. I think
> the whole affair will not amount to much and as soon as Bush
> nominates a replacement for Sandra it will probably be forgotten.

I heard he's supposed to be on TV tonight to make some kind of
announcement.

From what I've heard and read about Rove, he's nothing short of
brilliant. Apparently, he's been setting up Bush's presidency since
he was governor back in Texas.

> Repubs and Dems are always looking for a way to sling mud at each
> other and I think this is just the latest installment. It seems
> that most all the talking heads think this won't amount to much and
> don't think Rove broke any laws. Then again I'm sure many thought
> the same after the Watergate break-in.

That's pretty much what I'm thinking as well. More of the SOS...