Bill Putney wrote:
> Daniel J. Stern wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Bill Putney wrote:
>>
>>
>>> linda wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>> Is that the same APA that published a "scientific" study that said
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> it was found that pediphilia did not harm children who experienced it
>>>>>> Bill Putney
>>
>>
>>
>>>>> Honestly, i did not know that.
>>
>>
>>
>>>> You still don't. You have Bill's assertion that it happened; let's
>>>> see if he can back up his claim by producing the study.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Yet it's documented. But that won't be acknowledged.
>
>
> And you just proved me right.
>
>> Well, certainly it won't be acknowledged until you show us where you
>> found
>> that documentation. The assertion wasn't documented in your post, so for
>> now it's just your assertion.
>
>
> So I give you the information where you could easily find it. Face it -
> you aren't intersted in seeing it. You just want to attack me. Go
> right ahead. So the diversionary issue becomes whether I can document
> it (which I did) - not whether what I claimed is true or not.
>

NOW YOU KNOW WHAT I HAVE BEEN PUT THROUGH THE PAST THOUSAND
POSTINGS!!!!!!! How does it feel?


> Bill Putney
> (To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
> adddress with the letter 'x')
>
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
> News==----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000
> Newsgroups
> ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---