Rod Speed wrote:
> George Grapman > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Rod Speed wrote
>>
>>>George Grapman > wrote
>>>
>>>>Rod Speed wrote
>
>
>>>>>>>And while you certainly cant eliminate the possibility of a
>>>>>>>failure in any car which needs outside help, paying that high
>>>>>>>a fee per year for that isnt necessarily the most frugal way
>>>>>>>to cover that sort of problem. The cellphone coverage is
>>>>>>>generally rather better value in those circumstances.
>
>
>>>>>>Unfortunately most of those cell phone plans only can be accessed from
>>>>>>your cell phone. Out of a coverage area? Out of luck.
>
>
>>>>>Some of us have enough of a clue to use
>>>>>a cell plan where that doesnt happen.
>
>
>>>And anyone with a clue uses their cell to call the AAA anyway.
>
>
>>>>No cell service works everywhere. They all have dead areas.
>
>
>>>Anyone with a clue uses a cell service where that is rare.
>
>
>>But is still happens.
>
>
> And what matters IS WHETHER IT HAPPENS ENOUGH WHEN
> YOU NEED TO CALL SOMEONE WHEN THE CAR IS UNDRIVABLE,
> TO COST MORE FOR THE PAY PER SERVICE CALL TO OTHER
> THAN THE CELL TELCO OR THE AAA TO COST MORE THAN
> THE AAA WOULD DO OVER THAT TIME.
>
> There are other alternatives to payig for the service call too,
> most obviously with failed batterys and tyres where many of
> the operations that sell those dont charge much to deliver a
> new one to the car on the side of the road etc.
>
> <reams of the crapchild's puerile **** flushed where it belongs>
>
> No surprise that the best its ever managed is sales ****wit.
>
>

Yep. five days before his welfare check arrives bowel boy is back to
his standard replies.
Keep in mind the only time bowel boy worked he was fired from a
menial job before lunch time.