On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:26:10 -0800, Scott en Aztlán
> wrote:

>On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:06:58 -0600,
>(Brent P) wrote:
>
>>In article >, Scott en Aztlán wrote:
>>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 23:24:28 -0600,
>>> (Brent P) wrote:
>>>
>>>>If someone not on my policy without their own
>>>>insurance wrecks my car, the claim will likely be denied anyway the way
>>>>things seem to work.
>>>
>>> Uh, no. YOUR insurance will pay.
>>
>>Given the way things work, they'll find a way to deny it.
>
>Probably. But they are still SUPPOSED to pay.
>
>>But again, why should I pay for people without their own auto insurance
>>to drive my car, when they never, ever, will?
>
>Why should I have to pay insurance for a teenager who lives in my
>home, even if I never allow him to drive my cars?

If you sit in on a small claims court for a while, you'll see why.
"But, your honor, I'm not responsible for the damage my boy did
becasue I didn't give him permission to drive the car."
Know how far that flies? About half way to the judge's seat.
>
>Insurance is unfair bull**** no matter how you look at it.

--
Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"