Daniel J. Stern wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Bill Putney wrote:
>
>
>>linda wrote:
>
>
>>>>>Is that the same APA that published a "scientific" study that said that
>>>>>it was found that pediphilia did not harm children who experienced it
>>>>>Bill Putney
>
>
>>>>Honestly, i did not know that.
>
>
>>>You still don't. You have Bill's assertion that it happened; let's
>>>see if he can back up his claim by producing the study.
>
>
>>Yet it's documented. But that won't be acknowledged.

And you just proved me right.

> Well, certainly it won't be acknowledged until you show us where you found
> that documentation. The assertion wasn't documented in your post, so for
> now it's just your assertion.

So I give you the information where you could easily find it. Face it -
you aren't intersted in seeing it. You just want to attack me. Go
right ahead. So the diversionary issue becomes whether I can document
it (which I did) - not whether what I claimed is true or not.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
adddress with the letter 'x')


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---