View Single Post
  #6  
Old June 17th 05, 05:50 PM
Pi-Eyed Piper
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I lucked out, I know. Overall, I've been pretty happy with my "carbed' 4.2L.
It's running decent.

"Jerry Bransford" > wrote in message
news:53Dse.321$SF5.145@fed1read07...
> Early '89 Wranglers have the notorious Peugeot BA10, late model '89
> Wranglers got the better AX-5 or AX-15 trannie.
>
> Jerry
>
> Pi-Eyed Piper wrote:
>> my 89 has the ax15..
>>
>>
>> "Jerry Bransford" > wrote in message
>> news:7tCse.320$SF5.89@fed1read07...
>>
>>>At least a '91 or newer that starts the more reliable fuel injected 4.0L
>>>engine. I would avoid any late eighties Wranglers since they have the
>>>crappy troubleprone Peugeot transmission. If you want the better riding
>>>Wrangler with the improved suspension, '97 or newer is a good choice. My
>>>'97 has proven to be a great Jeep.
>>>
>>>lovs2fly wrote:
>>>
>>>>Any advice on what year to look for in a used wrangler?
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>Dennis
>>>
>>>--
>>>Jerry Bransford
>>>PP-ASEL N6TAY
>>>See the Geezer Jeep at
>>>http://members.cox.net/jerrypb/

>>
>>
>>

>
> --
> Jerry Bransford
> PP-ASEL N6TAY
> See the Geezer Jeep at
> http://members.cox.net/jerrypb/



Ads