On 14 Mar 2005 23:06:17 GMT, Jim Yanik .> wrote:

>Big Bill > wrote in
:
>
>> On 14 Mar 2005 15:07:44 GMT, Jim Yanik .> wrote:
>>
>>>Big Bill > wrote in
:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 21:47:50 GMT, Arif Khokar >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Big Bill wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Also no medical knowledge.
>>>>>> But don't let that stop you.
>>>>>
>>>>>Would the reason you're alluding to have anything to do with
>>>>>claudication? If so, a periphral vascular bypass operation should
>>>>>solve that problem.
>>>>
>>>> You and Daniel are showing a problem in your attitudes and
>>>> knowledge. It's not up to you to make any judgements in the use of
>>>> handicapped plates/plackards, or offer medical advice. That's a
>>>> verifiable fact.
>>>>
>>>
>>>As citizens,we have every right to make judgements.
>>>Or question a possible misuse of handicapped placards or parking
>>>spaces.
>>
>> Ok, let's take that at face value. You have that right.
>> Is it a smart thing to make those judgements public, and defend them
>> after it's been shown that you don't have the wherewithall to make
>> such judgements accurately?
>
>But it has NOT been shown.
>People CAN tell when a person is definitely not handicapped,without the
>benefit of medical files.
>The system is definitely abused.

You can? How?
>
>> I think not.
>> Obviously, others disagree.
>>
>
>There should be expiration dates on all handicapped tags,with a limited
>lifetime.

In AZ, there is.

--
Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"