Why do these LCD Monitors have a native resolution thats not standard such
as 1280X1024 in the first place?

Following the logical scale upwards from 640X480, 800X600, 1024X768 1280X960
NOT 1280X1024. Why not just pick any other arbitrary resolution that kinda
fits?

I understand why developers dont support non standard resolutions.

Mitch

"Larry" > wrote in message
news:8kUCe.64895$R21.46833@lakeread06...
> Then they can't sell to me. Their loss.
>
> Coding in fixed resolutions is DUMB.
>
> -Larry
>
> "Fisher" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:14:32 -0400, "Larry" > wrote:
>>
>>>I just run everything in the native resolution, which in my case is
>>>1280X1024. Works fine for me.
>>>
>>>If you buy a wide-screen or bigger monitor with a native res higher than
>>>that you do have to take into consideration you comptuers abilitiy to
>>>push
>>>that many pixels.
>>>
>>>Mine can, so I'm good.
>>>
>>>Ths is, however, why I haven't bought silent hunder 3. They locked the
>>>res
>>>to 1024X768 (dumb-asses).
>>>
>>>-Larry
>>
>> Lots of games won't run at 1280x1024. Lots.
>
>