In article >,
DTJ > wrote:
>On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:06:01 -0500,
>(Matthew Russotto) wrote:
>
>>>> 2) An efficient method of transport
>>>
>>>That already exists for other gases including propane.
>>
>>That is true, but those methods do not work well for hydrogen.
>>Hydrogen leaks from everything, and causes metals to become brittle.
>
>I have to believe that in spite of the fact that 90% of people drive
>like morons, our ingenuity could come up with a method to transport
>hydrogen if there were a potential profit.

That's all you've got, a personal conviction that it can be done?

What's the big advantage of hydrogen that gets people all excited over
it, despite the fact that there's no reason to believe it's more
practical than any of a number of more developed options?

--
There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can
result in a fully-depreciated one.